This study unpacks the construct of theorization – the process by which organizational ideas become delocalized and abstracted into theoretical models to support their diffusion across time and space. We adopt an institutional work lens to analyse the key components of theorization in contexts where institutional work is in transition from changing institutions to maintaining them. We build on a longitudinal inductive study of theorization by the Fair Labor Association – a private regulatory initiative that created and then enforced a code of conduct for working conditions in apparel factories. Our study reveals that when institutional work shifts from changing to maintaining an institutional arrangement of corporate social responsibility, there is a key change in how the Fair Labor Association theorizes roles and practices related to this arrangement. We observe that theorization on key practices largely remains intact, whereas the roles of different actors are theorized in a dramatically different manner. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the work involved in the aftermath of radical change by demonstrating the relative plasticity of roles over the rigidity of practices.
Ansari SM, Fiss PC, Zajac EJ (2010) Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review 35(1): 67–92. Google Scholar | |
Baker WE, Faulkner RR (1991) Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 279–309. Google Scholar | |
Barley SR (2008) Coalface institutionalism. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, 491–518. Google Scholar | |
Bartley T (2005) Corporate accountability and the privatization of labor standards: Struggles over codes of conduct in the apparel industry. Research in Political Sociology 14: 211–244. Google Scholar | |
Bartley T (2007) Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: The rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113(2): 297–351. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Bartley T (2010) Transnational private regulation in practice: The limits of forest and labor standards certification in Indonesia. Business & Politics 12(3): art. 7. Google Scholar | |
Boiral O (2007) Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science 18(1): 127–146. Google Scholar | |
Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarCrossRef | |
Boxenbaum E, Battilana J (2005) Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization 3(4): 355–383. Google Scholar Abstract | |
Callero PL (1994) From role-playing to role-using: Understanding role as resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 57(3): 228–243. Google Scholar | |
Cashore B, Van Kooten GC, Vertinsky I, . (2005) Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy and Economics 7(1): 53–69.Google Scholar | |
Currie G, Lockett A, Finn R, . (2012) Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies 33(7): 937–962. Google Scholar Abstract | |
Dacin MT, Munir K, Tracey P (2010) Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1393–1418. Google Scholar | |
Delbridge R, Edwards T (2008) Challenging conventions: Roles and processes during non-isomorphic institutional change. Human Relations 61(3): 299–325. Google Scholar Abstract | |
DeWinter R (2001) The anti-sweatshop movement: Constructing corporate moral agency in the global apparel industry. Ethics & International Affairs 15(2): 99–115. Google Scholar | |
DiMaggio P, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Djelic M-L, Sahlin-Andersson K (2006) Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Esbenshade J (2004) Monitoring Sweatshops: Workers, Consumers, and the Global Apparel Industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar | |
Etzion D, Ferraro F (2010) The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science 21(5): 1092–1107. Google Scholar | |
Feldman MS, Orlikowski WJ (2011) Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science 22(5): 1240–1253. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Fiss PC, Kennedy MT, Davis GF (2012) How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science 23(4): 1077–1099. Google Scholar | |
Garfinkel H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar | |
Garud R, Jain S, Kumaraswamy A (2002) Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 196–214. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Giddens A (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Actions, Structure and Contradictions in Social Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
Goffman E (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of the Experience. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar | |
Gond J-P, Kang N, Moon J (2011) The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society 40(4): 640–671. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Gondo MB, Amis JM (2013) Variations in practice adoption: The roles of conscious reflection and discourse. Academy of Management Review 38(2): 229–247. Google Scholar | |
Greenwood R, Suddaby R (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The Big Five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal 49(1): 27–48. Google Scholar | |
Greenwood R, Suddaby R, Hinings CR (2002) Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 58–80. Google Scholar | |
Guler I, Guillén MF, Macpherson JM (2002) Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly 47(2): 207–232. Google Scholar Abstract | |
Heaphy ED (2013) Repairing breaches with rules: Maintaining institutions in the face of everyday disruptions. Organization Science 24(5): 1291–1315. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Hoon C (2007) Committees as strategic practice: The role of strategic conversation in a public administration. Human Relations 60(6): 921–952. Google Scholar Abstract | |
Jepperson RL (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In: Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 143–163. Google Scholar | |
Lam LL (1992) Designer duty: Extending liability to manufacturers for violations of labor standards in garment industry sweatshops. The University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141(2): 623–667. Google Scholar | |
Landau D, Drori I, Terjesen S (2014) Multiple legitimacy narratives and planned organizational change. Human Relations 67(11): 1321–1345. Google Scholar Link | |
Lawrence TB, Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In: Clegg R, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, 215–254. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (2009) Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In: Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (eds) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–28. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Leblebici H, Salancik GR, Copay A, King T (1991) Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(3): 333–363. Google Scholar | |
Lim S-J, Phillips J (2008) Embedding CSR values: The global footwear industry’s evolving governance structure. Journal of Business Ethics 81(1): 143–156. Google Scholar | |
Locke R, Qin F, Brause A (2007) Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 61(1): 3–31. Google Scholar | |
Lok J (2010) Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal 52(6): 1305–1335. Google Scholar | |
Maguire S, Hardy C (2006) The emergence of new global institutions: A discursive perspective. Organization Studies 27(1): 7–29. Google Scholar Abstract | |
Maguire S, Hardy C, Lawrence TB (2004) Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal 47(5): 657–679. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Marques JC (2015) Private regulatory fragmentation as public policy: Governing Canada’s mining industry. Journal of Business Ethics. Epub ahead of print 21 October 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–014-2377-3. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Marx A (2008) Limits to non-state market regulation: A qualitative comparative analysis of the international sport footwear industry and the FLA. Regulation & Governance 2(2): 253–273. Google Scholar | |
Mena S, Palazzo G (2012) Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(3): 529–559. Google Scholar | |
Mena S, Waeger D (2014) Activism for corporate responsibility: Conceptualizing private regulation opportunity structures. Journal of Management Studies 51(7): 1091–1117. Google Scholar | |
Mena S, De Leede M, Baumann D, . (2010) Advancing the business and human rights agenda: Dialogue, empowerment, and constructive engagement. Journal of Business Ethics 93(1): 161–188. Google Scholar | |
Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–363. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Perkmann M, Spicer A (2008) How are management fashions institutionalized? The role of institutional work. Human Relations 61(6): 811–844. Google Scholar Link | |
Powell WW, Colyvas JA (2008) Microfoundations of institutional theory. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, 276–298. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology 108(4): 795–843. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Reinecke J, Manning S, Von Hagen O (2012) The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies 33(5–6): 791–814. Google Scholar Link | |
Richardson AJ, Eberlein B (2011) Legitimating transnational standard-setting: The case of the International Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Business Ethics 98(2): 217–245. Google Scholar | |
Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
Seo MG, Creed WED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 222–247. Google Scholar | |
Slager R, Gond JP, Moon J (2012) Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard. Organization Studies 33(5–6): 763–790. Google Scholar Link | |
Smets M, Jarzabkowski P (2013) Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations 66(10): 1279–1309. Google Scholar Link | |
Soule SA (2004) Diffusion processes within and across movements. In: Snow DA, Soule SA, Kriesi HP (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 294–310. Google Scholar | |
Spar DL, La Mure LT (2003) The power of activism: Assessing the impact of NGOs on global business. California Management Review 45(3): 78–101. Google Scholar Abstract | |
Strang D, Meyer JW (1993) Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society 22(4): 487–511. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Strang D, Soule SA (1998) Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 265–290. Google Scholar CrossRef | |
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
Stryker S (1980) Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings. Google Scholar | |
Suddaby R (2006) What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal 49(4): 633–642. Google Scholar | |
Suddaby R (2010) Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry 19(1): 14–20. Google Scholar Link | |
Suddaby R, Greenwood R (2005) Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 35–67. Google Scholar Link | |
Suddaby R, Cooper DJ, Greenwood R (2007) Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(4–5): 333–362. Google Scholar | |
Tolbert PS, Zucker LG (1996) The institutionalization of institutional theory. In: Clegg SR, Hardy C, Nord WR (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, 175–190. Google Scholar | |
Trank CQ, Washington M (2009) Maintaining an institution in a contested organizational field: The work of the AACSB and its constituents. In: Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B (eds) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236–261. Google Scholar | |
Westphal JD, Gulati R, Shortell SM (1997) Customization or conformity? An institutional and network perspective on the content and consequences of TQM adoption. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2): 366–394. Google Scholar | |
Yu X (2009) From passive beneficiary to active stakeholder: Workers’ participation in CSR movement against labor abuses. Journal of Business Ethics 87: 233–249. Google Scholar | |
Zadek S (2004) The path to corporate responsibility. Harvard Business Review 82(December): 125–132. Google Scholar | |
Zietsma C, Lawrence TB (2010) Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly 55(2): 189–221. Google Scholar Link | |
Zilber TB (2008) The work of meanings in institutional processes and thinking. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, 151–169. Google Scholar |
Sébastien Mena is a Lecturer in Management at Cass Business School, City University London, UK. His research interests lie in institutional change and stability in the interactions between business and society, related to topics such as corporate responsibility, corporate governance and sustainability. Sébastien’s research has been published in journals such as Academy of Management Review, Business Ethics Quarterly and Journal of Management Studies. [Email: sebastien. mena. 1@city. ac. uk]
Roy Suddaby is a Professor and Winspear Chair in Management at the Peter B Gustavson School of Business, University of Victoria, Canada and Research Professor at Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle University, UK. His research focuses on processes of organizational and societal change. His research has been published in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Administrative Science Quarterly and Journal of Management Studies. [Email: rsuddaby@uvic. ca]
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder